data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f688/0f6888245bfe390adde379308781a00ca5190298" alt=""
25 September 2011
Films on Schooling and Education
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f688/0f6888245bfe390adde379308781a00ca5190298" alt=""
09 September 2011
Music and the Media Industrial Complex
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, I was engaged in a collaborative research project headed by Charles Keil on the question of 'participatory discrepancies' in music. Keil contended that the engaging elements of music were in the subliminal, subsyntactical, micro-timed details, that these minor variations or, as he put it, discrepancies, are evident over the course of a performance in the interactions between players. This offered a new way to think about music that was not tethered to the conventions of Western musicological scholarship and I was thrilled to be involved in a project that was questioning the status quo in academic research on music. Keil asked if I could demonstrate that these 'PDs' existed by using then current analog to digital converter technology to visually observe musical performances on the micro-timed level. The resulting research was published in 1995 in a special issue of the journal 'Ethnomusicology,' for which the editors solicited responses from a number of noted ethnomusicologists and rejoinders from Keil and I to those responses. What follows is my rejoinder, which begins by referring to the responses but then veers in another direction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)